Options
Academic risk taking and teaching quality in higher education
Hübner, Vanessa; Pfost, Maximilian (2024): Academic risk taking and teaching quality in higher education, in: Learning and instruction, Amsterdam [u.a.]: Elsevier Science, Jg. 90, Nr. 101877, S. 1–12, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101877.
Faculty/Chair:
Author:
Title of the Journal:
Learning and instruction
ISSN:
1873-3263
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2024
Volume:
90
Issue:
101877
Pages:
Language:
English
Abstract:
Background:
Academic risk taking (ART) is a type of learning-beneficial student engagement with a risk of making errors. Students for example respond to questions during seminars, even though they are not sure about the correctness of their answer. Next to a trait-component, ART is assumed to have a state component which can change depending on the context.
Aims:
In this study, we explore whether students' ART differs by seminar belonging, and whether teaching quality explains these differences. Additionally, we consider the association between students’ goal orientation and ART.
Sample:
For this purpose, a sample of 381 university students nested in 38 seminars and instructors was acquired.
Methods:
Data was analyzed following a two-level structural equation modeling approach.
Results:
We find significant differences in students’ ART by seminar group, explaining between 11.0% and 16.3% of variance. Reproduction orientation in teaching seems to discourage ART.
Conclusions:
Our results contribute to an understanding of the multidimensional dynamics of teaching and learning, and offer implications for teaching quality development.
Academic risk taking (ART) is a type of learning-beneficial student engagement with a risk of making errors. Students for example respond to questions during seminars, even though they are not sure about the correctness of their answer. Next to a trait-component, ART is assumed to have a state component which can change depending on the context.
Aims:
In this study, we explore whether students' ART differs by seminar belonging, and whether teaching quality explains these differences. Additionally, we consider the association between students’ goal orientation and ART.
Sample:
For this purpose, a sample of 381 university students nested in 38 seminars and instructors was acquired.
Methods:
Data was analyzed following a two-level structural equation modeling approach.
Results:
We find significant differences in students’ ART by seminar group, explaining between 11.0% and 16.3% of variance. Reproduction orientation in teaching seems to discourage ART.
Conclusions:
Our results contribute to an understanding of the multidimensional dynamics of teaching and learning, and offer implications for teaching quality development.
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Academic risk taking
Teaching quality
Goal orientation
Higher education
Learning with errors
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
February 5, 2024
Project(s):
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/93237