Options
Machine learning can detect faking on self-reports and on Implicit Association Tests (IATs)
Röhner, Jessica; Thoss, Philipp, J.; Schütz, Astrid (2024): Machine learning can detect faking on self-reports and on Implicit Association Tests (IATs), in: Bamberg: Otto-Friedrich-Universität, doi: 10.20378/irb-104669.
Faculty/Chair:
Author:
Conference:
Virtual conference of the Association of Psychological Science (APS), May 26-27, 2021
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2024
Pages:
Language:
English
DOI:
Abstract:
Even experts cannot detect faking above chance (Fiedler & Bluemke, 2005). Recent studies (Boldt et al., 2018; Calanna et al., 2020) have suggested that machine learning may help in this endeavor. The ability of classifiers to detect faking depends on which classifiers are implemented (logistic regression vs. random forest vs. XGBoost; Calanna et al., 2020). The ability of classifiers to detect faking also depends on the type of input data (response patterns vs. scores; Calanna et al., 2020). However, faking differs with respect to faking conditions, and previous efforts have not taken these differences into account.
Keywords:
Machine Learning
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Type:
Conferenceobject
Activation date:
May 27, 2025
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/104669