Options
Closing the Gap : The Tripartite Structure of Sustainability as a Tool for Sustainable Education : A Systematic Literature Review
Meyer, Barbara E.; Gaertner, Elena; Elting, Christian (2024): Closing the Gap : The Tripartite Structure of Sustainability as a Tool for Sustainable Education : A Systematic Literature Review, in: Sustainability, Basel: MDPI, Jg. 16, Nr. 9, S. 1–18, doi: 10.3390/su16093622.
Faculty/Chair:
Author:
Title of the Journal:
Sustainability
ISSN:
2071-1050
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2024
Volume:
16
Issue:
9
Pages:
Language:
English
DOI:
Abstract:
(1) In an era where sustainable behavior is increasingly crucial, understanding the discrepancy between individuals’ sustainability-oriented values and their actual behaviors, known as the inner–outer gap, is vital. This systematic literature review explores the potential of the Tripartite
Structure of Sustainability (TSS) framework to address this gap within the context of sustainable education. By reviewing the literature from the APA, ERIC, andWeb of Science databases, searched on 25 October 2020, the factors infuencing sustainable actions were systematically examined. Articles had to be relevant to the topic (sustainability, morality in relation to sustainability, or morality in general) and report on empirically validated factors that have an impact on the inner-outer gap.
(2) By employing a qualitative content analysis approach, 56 articles over a 15-year period were analyzed, identifying 83 factors that either bridged or reinforced the inner–outer gap. These factors were categorized within the TSS framework, which segments sustainability-oriented actions into individual, social, and self-transcendent domains, alongside their activation points: stable, situational, or automated.
(3) The analysis revealed that self-focused factors often reinforce the gap, suggesting they are a hindrance to sustainable behavior. Conversely, self-transcendent factors consistently bridged the gap, promoting sustainability. Social factors showed variable impacts based on the ethical and sustainable context they were placed in, suggesting that the social environment’s orientation signifcantly infuences sustainable behavior. (4) This study concludes that the TSS framework offers a promising approach to advancing education for sustainable development (ESD) and contributes insights into how to promote the required paradigm shift towards holistic and interconnected perspectives.
Structure of Sustainability (TSS) framework to address this gap within the context of sustainable education. By reviewing the literature from the APA, ERIC, andWeb of Science databases, searched on 25 October 2020, the factors infuencing sustainable actions were systematically examined. Articles had to be relevant to the topic (sustainability, morality in relation to sustainability, or morality in general) and report on empirically validated factors that have an impact on the inner-outer gap.
(2) By employing a qualitative content analysis approach, 56 articles over a 15-year period were analyzed, identifying 83 factors that either bridged or reinforced the inner–outer gap. These factors were categorized within the TSS framework, which segments sustainability-oriented actions into individual, social, and self-transcendent domains, alongside their activation points: stable, situational, or automated.
(3) The analysis revealed that self-focused factors often reinforce the gap, suggesting they are a hindrance to sustainable behavior. Conversely, self-transcendent factors consistently bridged the gap, promoting sustainability. Social factors showed variable impacts based on the ethical and sustainable context they were placed in, suggesting that the social environment’s orientation signifcantly infuences sustainable behavior. (4) This study concludes that the TSS framework offers a promising approach to advancing education for sustainable development (ESD) and contributes insights into how to promote the required paradigm shift towards holistic and interconnected perspectives.
GND Keywords: ;
Nachhaltigkeit
Bildung
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
education for sustainable development
systematic literature review
inner–outer gap
ego development theory
educational psychology
judgment–action gap
intention–action gap
value–action gap
knowledge–action gap
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Open Access Journal:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
April 29, 2024
Versioning
Question on publication
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/94958