Universals of reference in discourse and grammar : Evidence from the Multi-CAST collection of spoken corpora




Faculty/Professorship: General Linguistics  
Author(s): Haig, Geoffrey  ; Schiborr, Nils Norman ; Schnell, Stefan
Title of the Journal: Language documentation and conservation : LD&C
ISSN: 1934-5275
Publisher Information: Honolulu, Hawaii : University of Hawai’i Press
Year of publication: 2021
Issue: SP25: Doing Corpus-Based Typology With Spoken Language Corpora: State of the art
Pages: 141-177
Language(s): English
Abstract: 
Data from under-researched languages are now available in sufficient quantity and quality to feed into corpus-based approaches to language typology. In this paper we present Multi-CAST (Multilingual Corpus of Annotated Spoken Texts), a project designed to facilitate cross-linguistic comparison of naturalistic discourse across typologically diverse languages, which implements a purpose-built shared annotation scheme. After sketching the rationale and architecture of Multi-CAST, we illustrate the efficacy of the method with two case-studies: The first one investigates the rates of lexical (as opposed to pronominal and zero) realization of arguments in discourse across a sample of 15 typologically diverse languages. Our results reveal a remarkable and hitherto unnoticed uniformity in the density of lexical references, despite the lack of content control in the corpora. The second addresses the question of whether cross-linguistically attested regularities in morphosyntax can meaningfully be related to frequency effects in discourse. We find some support for frequency-based explanations, but our data also show that the frequency accounts leave several key questions unanswered. Overall, our findings underscore that research based on language documentation-derived corpus data, and in particular spoken language data, is not only possible, but in fact crucially necessary for testing frequency-based explanations, because these data stem from spoken language and typologically diverse languages. We also identify a number of epistemological and methodological shortcomings with our approach, and discuss some of the requirements for further innovation in areas of corpus building, corpus annotation, and typological comparability.
GND Keywords: Korpus, Linguistik; Kontrastive Linguistik; Sprachtypologie
Keywords: corpus-based typology, universals of language use, discourse structure, referential choice, marking asymmetries
DDC Classification: 400 Language & linguistics  
RVK Classification: ES 900   
Peer Reviewed: Ja
International Distribution: Ja
Type: Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74660
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/57345
Release Date: 19. December 2022