The Effect of Rating Scale Length on the Occurrence of Inappropriate Category Use for the Assessment of Job Satisfaction: an Experimental Online Study





Faculty/Professorship: Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) 
Author(s): Kutscher, Tanja ; Eid, Michael
Title of the Journal: Journal of Well-Being Assessment
ISSN: 2509-4637, 2509-4629
Publisher Information: Cham : Springer International Publishing AG
Year of publication: 2020
Volume: 4
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-35
Language(s): English
DOI: 10.1007/s41543-020-00024-2
Abstract: 
When job satisfaction is measured in national panel surveys using a rating scale that consists of many response categories the psychometric quality of the data obtained is often reduced. One reason lies in an inappropriate category use (e.g., in terms of response styles or ignoring superfluous categories), which occurs when respondents are faced with an overwhelmingly large number of response options. The use of response styles can also be triggered by stable respondent characteristics. The objective of the present between-subject experimental study is to explore the impact of rating scale length on the occurrence of inappropriate category use and scale reliability. In addition, this study investigates which stable respondent characteristics and job-related factors consistently predict the use of a particular response style across all experimental conditions. A sample of MTurk workers (N = 7042) filled out a 12-item online questionnaire on aspects of job satisfaction, with a 4-, 6-, or 11-point rating scale randomly assigned. Considering the three-dimensional structure of the job satisfaction measure, we applied a multidimensional extension of the restricted mixed generalized partial credit model to explore category use patterns within each condition. The results show a similar configuration of three response-style classes in all conditions. Nevertheless, the proportion of respondents who used the rating scale inappropriately was lower in the conditions with fewer response categories. An exception was the extreme response style, which showed a similar prevalence rate in all conditions. Furthermore, we found that the use of extreme response style can be explained by a high level of general self-efficacy and perceived job autonomy, regardless of rating scale length. The findings of the study demonstrate that the prevalence of inappropriate category use can be reduced by administering rating scales with six or four response categories instead of eleven. These findings may be extended to other domains of life satisfaction.
GND Keywords: Arbeitszufriedenheit; Fragebogen; Skala; Studie
Keywords: Rating scale, Number of response categories, Response style, Job satisfaction, Experimental study, Mixture item response theory approach
DDC Classification: 150 Psychology  
RVK Classification: CW 2000   
Peer Reviewed: Ja
International Distribution: Ja
Type: Article
URI: https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/55188
Release Date: 19. August 2022