Analogy-based Collective Decision-making and Incremental Change in International Organizations




Faculty/Professorship: International Relations  
Author(s): Dörfler, Thomas; Gehring, Thomas  
Publisher Information: Bamberg : Otto-Friedrich-Universität
Year of publication: 2022
Pages: 753-778
Source/Other editions: European Journal of International Relations, 27 (2021), 3, S. 753-778 - ISSN: 1460-3713
is version of: 10.1177/1354066120987889
Year of first publication: 2021
Language(s): English
Licence: Creative Commons - CC BY-NC - Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International 
URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:473-irb-548936
Abstract: 
We examine how analogy-based collective decision-making of member states contributes to the endogenous emergence of informal rules and the incremental change of international organizations (IOs). Decision-making by analogy is an important characteristic of day-to-day decision-making in IOs. Relating current decisions to previous ones through analogies drives incremental change and simultaneously reinforces organizational resilience. Whereas the foreign policy analysis literature shows that analogies can be used as cognitive shortcuts in fuzzy and complex foreign policy situations, we focus on their use to overcome social ambiguity (indeterminacy) of coordination situations in IOs. Drawing on psychological conceptions, we develop two micro-level mechanisms that elucidate the effects of analogy-based collective decision-making in member-driven IOs. Analogy-based collective decisions emphasizing similarity between a current situation and previous ones follow an established problem schema and produce expansive and increasingly well-established informal rules. Collective decisions that are analogy-based but emphasize a crucial difference follow different problem schemas and trigger the emergence of additional informal rules that apply to new classes of cases. The result is an increasingly fine-grained web of distinct organizational solutions for a growing number of problems. Accordingly, an IO can increasingly facilitate collective decision-making and gains resilience. Empirically, we probe these propositions with a documentary analysis of decision-making in the Yugoslavia sanctions committee, established by the United Nations Security Council to deal with a stream of requests for exempting certain goods or services from the comprehensive economic embargo imposed on Yugoslavia in response to the War in the Balkans.
GND Keywords: Internationale Organisation; Entscheidungsfindung; Vereinte Nationen. Sicherheitsrat; Sanktion; Jugoslawienkriege
Keywords: Historical institutionalism, analogical reasoning, international organizations, decision-making, Security Council, sanctions
DDC Classification: 320 Political Science  
RVK Classification: MK 7750   
Type: Article
URI: https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/54893
Release Date: 8. August 2022
Project: The United Nations Security Council from an Organizational Perspective
Collective Agency of Horizontal Regulatory Organizations in Global Environmental and Financial Market Governance

File SizeFormat  
fisba54893.pdf262.63 kBPDFView/Open