Options
Cross-sectional association between active commuting and perceived commuting stress in Austrian adults : Results from the HOTway study
Sattler, Matteo C.; Färber, Tanja; Traußnig, Katharina; u. a. (2020): Cross-sectional association between active commuting and perceived commuting stress in Austrian adults : Results from the HOTway study, in: Mental Health and Physical Activity, Amsterdam [u.a.]: Elsevier, Jg. 19, Nr. 100356, doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100356.
Faculty/Chair:
Title of the Journal:
Mental Health and Physical Activity
ISSN:
1755-2966
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2020
Volume:
19
Issue:
100356
Pages:
Language:
English
Abstract:
Objective
Little is known about the acute psychological stress responses caused by commuting. Evidence for the benefits of active commuting (e.g., walking, cycling) is usually based on studies without measurements in free-living environments and without consideration of daily variations in stress. This study investigated the association between commuting mode (active, passive) and perceived commuting stress, assessed on multiple days immediately after commuting.
Methods
Adults participating in the cross-sectional ‘Healthy On The way’ (HOTway) study between 2016 and 2017 in Graz, Austria, were included. Participants completed an online survey and responded to statements about perceived stress (demands, tension) on three days before commuting (baseline stress) and after arrival (commuting stress), respectively. Active commuting was defined as cycling and/or walking (passive: car, motorbike, public transport).
Results
Of 188 participants (93 women, mean age: 28.0 ± 10.0 years) included, 124 were active and 64 were passive commuters. Active commuting was associated with less perceived commuting stress compared to passive commuting (bi = −2.95, 95% CI: −4.97 to −0.92, p = .005), even after controlling for subjective well-being, physical activity, commuting time and other confounding variables.
Conclusion
Active commuting is related to a small reduction in perceived commuting stress. The results of this study support the promotion of active commuting for population (mental) health but future studies on the causal mechanisms and the role of active commuting in the recovery from previous stressors are needed.
Little is known about the acute psychological stress responses caused by commuting. Evidence for the benefits of active commuting (e.g., walking, cycling) is usually based on studies without measurements in free-living environments and without consideration of daily variations in stress. This study investigated the association between commuting mode (active, passive) and perceived commuting stress, assessed on multiple days immediately after commuting.
Methods
Adults participating in the cross-sectional ‘Healthy On The way’ (HOTway) study between 2016 and 2017 in Graz, Austria, were included. Participants completed an online survey and responded to statements about perceived stress (demands, tension) on three days before commuting (baseline stress) and after arrival (commuting stress), respectively. Active commuting was defined as cycling and/or walking (passive: car, motorbike, public transport).
Results
Of 188 participants (93 women, mean age: 28.0 ± 10.0 years) included, 124 were active and 64 were passive commuters. Active commuting was associated with less perceived commuting stress compared to passive commuting (bi = −2.95, 95% CI: −4.97 to −0.92, p = .005), even after controlling for subjective well-being, physical activity, commuting time and other confounding variables.
Conclusion
Active commuting is related to a small reduction in perceived commuting stress. The results of this study support the promotion of active commuting for population (mental) health but future studies on the causal mechanisms and the role of active commuting in the recovery from previous stressors are needed.
GND Keywords: ; ; ;
Pendler
Berufspendler
Körperliche Aktivität
Stress
Keywords: ; ;
Physical activity
Travel Commuting
Stress Work
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
February 25, 2022
Versioning
Question on publication
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/53376