Options
Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction : a Randomized Controlled Study
Limmer, Anja; Laser, Martin; Schütz, Astrid (2021): Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction : a Randomized Controlled Study, in: Bamberg: Otto-Friedrich-Universität, S. 1–10, doi: 10.20378/irb-49931.
Author:
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2021
Pages:
Source/Other editions:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10 (2021). - ISSN: 1532-7558
Language:
English
DOI:
Abstract:
Background: To enhance effective prevention programs after myocardial infarction (MI), the study examined the effects and feasibility of mobile biofeedback training on heart rate variability (HRV-BF).
Methods: Forty-six outpatients aged 41 to 79 years with a documented MI were randomized to HRV-BF versus usual care. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) analyses were performed to test improvements in measures of short- and long-time HRV, namely, the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and well-being after 12 weeks of HRV-BF.
Results: There were intervention effects for short-time HRV (d > 0.4, p < 0.04), which were partly replicated in the GEE models that accounted for control variables: In the HRV-BF group, the high frequency HRV (group x time interaction: β = 0.59, p = 0.04) compensated for significantly lower baseline levels than the group with usual care. In an optimal dose sample (on average two HRV-BF sessions a day), SDNN significantly increased after HRV-BF (p = 0.002) but not in the waitlist control group. Compensatory trends of HRV-BF were also found for high-frequency HRV and self-efficacy. No adverse effects of the intervention were found but neither were effects on long-time HRV measures.
Conclusion: The results showed the feasibility of self-guided HRV-BF for almost all post-MI patients. HRV-BF as an adjunctive behavioral treatment increased HRV, which is an indicator of lower cardiovascular risk, and self-efficacy, which suggests heightened psychological resilience. These benefits warrant confirmation and tests of sustainability in larger studies.
Methods: Forty-six outpatients aged 41 to 79 years with a documented MI were randomized to HRV-BF versus usual care. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) analyses were performed to test improvements in measures of short- and long-time HRV, namely, the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and well-being after 12 weeks of HRV-BF.
Results: There were intervention effects for short-time HRV (d > 0.4, p < 0.04), which were partly replicated in the GEE models that accounted for control variables: In the HRV-BF group, the high frequency HRV (group x time interaction: β = 0.59, p = 0.04) compensated for significantly lower baseline levels than the group with usual care. In an optimal dose sample (on average two HRV-BF sessions a day), SDNN significantly increased after HRV-BF (p = 0.002) but not in the waitlist control group. Compensatory trends of HRV-BF were also found for high-frequency HRV and self-efficacy. No adverse effects of the intervention were found but neither were effects on long-time HRV measures.
Conclusion: The results showed the feasibility of self-guided HRV-BF for almost all post-MI patients. HRV-BF as an adjunctive behavioral treatment increased HRV, which is an indicator of lower cardiovascular risk, and self-efficacy, which suggests heightened psychological resilience. These benefits warrant confirmation and tests of sustainability in larger studies.
GND Keywords: ; ; ;
Herzinfarkt
Herzfrequenzvariabilität
Biofeedback
Sekundärprävention
Keywords:
Myocardial Infarction, Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback, Secondary Prevention, Risk factors, Self-Efficacy
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
July 30, 2021
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/49931