Options
Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies : A meta-analysis
Roehling, Stefan; Schlegel, Karl A; Wölfler, Henriette; u. a. (2018): Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies : A meta-analysis, in: Clinical oral implants research, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, Jg. 29, Nr. S16, S. 135–153, doi: 10.1111/clr.13352.
Faculty/Chair:
By:
... ; Wölfler, Henriette; ...
Title of the Journal:
Clinical oral implants research
ISSN:
0905-7161
Corporate Body:
European Association for Osseointegration
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2018
Volume:
29
Issue:
S16
Pages:
Language:
English
DOI:
Abstract:
Objectives
To evaluate implant survival, peri-implant marginal bone loss, technical, and biological complications as well as aesthetic outcomes of zirconia implants in clinical studies.
Material and Methods
Electronic (Medline, Embase) and hand searches were performed to identify clinical studies published between January 2004 and March 2017 investigating zirconia dental implants with a mean follow-up of at least 12 months. Primary outcomes were implant survival and peri-implant marginal bone loss. Secondary outcomes included technical and biological complications as well as aesthetic outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate implant survival and marginal bone loss.
Results
From 943 titles, 264 abstracts were selected. Subsequently, 80 full-text articles were screened, and 18 studies were included for data extraction. One- (14 studies) and 2-piece zirconia implants (4 studies) were investigated. Commercially available (CA) (510 implants, 398 patients) and not commercially available (NCA) zirconia implants (618 implants, 343 patients) were identified. For CA implants (follow-up: 12–61.20 months), technical complications (1.6%), implant fractures (0.2%) and biological complications (4.2%) were reported. Meta-analyses estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.0%–99.6%) and 97.2% (95% CI: 94.7%–99.7%), respectively, and a mean 1-year marginal bone loss of 0.7 mm (95% CI: 0.4–1.0 mm).
Conclusions
Since 2004, the survival rates of CA implants significantly improved compared with NCA implants. CA 1-piece zirconia implants showed similar 1- and 2-year mean survival rates and marginal bone loss after 1 year compared with published data for titanium implants. However, more clinical long-term data are needed to confirm the presently evaluated promising short-term outcomes.
To evaluate implant survival, peri-implant marginal bone loss, technical, and biological complications as well as aesthetic outcomes of zirconia implants in clinical studies.
Material and Methods
Electronic (Medline, Embase) and hand searches were performed to identify clinical studies published between January 2004 and March 2017 investigating zirconia dental implants with a mean follow-up of at least 12 months. Primary outcomes were implant survival and peri-implant marginal bone loss. Secondary outcomes included technical and biological complications as well as aesthetic outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate implant survival and marginal bone loss.
Results
From 943 titles, 264 abstracts were selected. Subsequently, 80 full-text articles were screened, and 18 studies were included for data extraction. One- (14 studies) and 2-piece zirconia implants (4 studies) were investigated. Commercially available (CA) (510 implants, 398 patients) and not commercially available (NCA) zirconia implants (618 implants, 343 patients) were identified. For CA implants (follow-up: 12–61.20 months), technical complications (1.6%), implant fractures (0.2%) and biological complications (4.2%) were reported. Meta-analyses estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.0%–99.6%) and 97.2% (95% CI: 94.7%–99.7%), respectively, and a mean 1-year marginal bone loss of 0.7 mm (95% CI: 0.4–1.0 mm).
Conclusions
Since 2004, the survival rates of CA implants significantly improved compared with NCA implants. CA 1-piece zirconia implants showed similar 1- and 2-year mean survival rates and marginal bone loss after 1 year compared with published data for titanium implants. However, more clinical long-term data are needed to confirm the presently evaluated promising short-term outcomes.
GND Keywords:
Zahnimplantat
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
biological complications
dental implants
aesthetics
implant survival
marginal bone loss
meta-analysis
prosthetics
soft tissue
technical complications
yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia
zirconium oxide
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
January 7, 2021
Versioning
Question on publication
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/49258