Ecological Art Experience : How we can gain experimental control while preserving ecologically valid settings and context





Faculty/Professorship: General Psychology and Methodology  
Author(s): Carbon, Claus-Christian  
Title of the Journal: Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Corporate Body: Frontiers Research Foundation
Publisher Information: Lausanne
Year of publication: 2020
Volume: 11
Issue: 800
Pages: 1-14
Language(s): English
Remark: 
Zweitveröffentlichung der Verlagsversion am 09.03.2021
Licence: Creative Commons - CC BY - Attribution 4.0 International 
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00800
Abstract: 
One point that definitions of art experience disagree about is whether this kind of experience is qualitatively different from experiences relating to ordinary objects and everyday contexts. Here, we follow an ecological approach that assumes art experience has its own specific quality, which is, not least, determined by typical contexts of art presentation. Practically, we systematically observe typical phenomena of experiencing art in ecologically valid or real-world settings such as museum contexts. Based on evidence gained in this manner, we emulate and implement essential properties of ecological contexts (e.g., free choice of viewing distance and time, large scale of artworks, and exhibition-like context) in controlled laboratory experiments. We found, for instance, that for large-scale paintings by Pollock and Rothko, preferred viewing distances as well as distances inducing the most intense art experiences – including Aesthetic Aha insights – were much larger than typical viewing distances realized in laboratory studies. Following Carbon’s (2019) terminology of measurement strategies of art experience, the combined use of “Path #1” (real-world context) and “Path #2” (mildly controlled, still ecologically valid settings and contexts) enables us to understand and investigate much closer what is really happening when people experience art.
Keywords: empirical aesthetics, ecologically valid testing, art and perception, art experience, museum, gallery, real world
Peer Reviewed: Ja
International Distribution: Ja
Open Access Journal: Ja
Type: Article
URI: https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/49254
Release Date: 7. January 2021
Project: Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2012-2020

File SizeFormat  
fisba49254.pdf8.32 MBPDFView/Open