Options
The impact of a structured education and treatment programme (FLASH) for people with diabetes using a flash sensor-based glucose monitoring system : Results of a randomized controlled trial
Hermanns, Norbert; Ehrmann, Dominic; Schipfer, Melanie; u. a. (2025): The impact of a structured education and treatment programme (FLASH) for people with diabetes using a flash sensor-based glucose monitoring system : Results of a randomized controlled trial, in: Bamberg: Otto-Friedrich-Universität, S. 111–121.
Faculty/Chair:
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2025
Pages:
Source/Other editions:
Diabetes research and clinical practice, Amsterdam [u.a.]: Elsevier, 2019, Jg. 150, S. 111–121, ISSN: 0168-8227, 1872-8227
Year of first publication:
2019
Language:
English
Abstract:
Aims: Flash sensor-based glucose monitoring (FSGM) provides people with diabetes considerably more information on their glycaemic control. We have developed and evaluated a structured education and treatment programme, termed FLASH, to assist FSGM users to understand and use the available glycaemic information for optimization of their diabetes treatment.
Methods: We report on a multi-centre, randomized, parallel trial with a six-month follow-up involving 216 eligible participants (16–75 years old) on intensive insulin therapy. The primary outcome was HbA1c change from baseline to six months. Secondary outcomes were measures of glucose control as assessed by FSGM, as well as changes in behavioural and psychosocial measures.
Results: At six months, the between-group difference in HbA1c reduction was significant, favouring FLASH education compared to the control group receiving no FLASH education (−0.28%, 95% CI −0.16% to −0.40% vs.−0.11%, 95% CI 0.00% to −0.22%; with a between-group difference of −0.17%, 95% CI −0.01% to −0.33%; p = 0.033). Participation in FLASH education also resulted in significant improvements in time spent in the target glucose range, in diabetes-related distress scores and in satisfaction with the glucose monitoring method. FLASH education also resulted in significant improvements in the use of glycaemic information provided by FSGM and in reduced self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) fingerstick testing.
Methods: We report on a multi-centre, randomized, parallel trial with a six-month follow-up involving 216 eligible participants (16–75 years old) on intensive insulin therapy. The primary outcome was HbA1c change from baseline to six months. Secondary outcomes were measures of glucose control as assessed by FSGM, as well as changes in behavioural and psychosocial measures.
Results: At six months, the between-group difference in HbA1c reduction was significant, favouring FLASH education compared to the control group receiving no FLASH education (−0.28%, 95% CI −0.16% to −0.40% vs.−0.11%, 95% CI 0.00% to −0.22%; with a between-group difference of −0.17%, 95% CI −0.01% to −0.33%; p = 0.033). Participation in FLASH education also resulted in significant improvements in time spent in the target glucose range, in diabetes-related distress scores and in satisfaction with the glucose monitoring method. FLASH education also resulted in significant improvements in the use of glycaemic information provided by FSGM and in reduced self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) fingerstick testing.
GND Keywords: ;
Diabetes
Selbstmanagement
Keywords: ; ; ;
Diabetes
Flash glucose monitoring
Education
Self-management
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
August 8, 2025
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/109419