Options
Psychometric evaluation and updated community norms of the WHO-5 well-being index, based on a representative German sample
Kliem, Sören; Lohmann, Anna; Fischer, Sebastian; u. a. (2025): Psychometric evaluation and updated community norms of the WHO-5 well-being index, based on a representative German sample, in: Frontiers in psychology, Lausanne: Frontiers Research Foundation, Jg. 16, Nr. 1592614, S. 1–10, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1592614.
Faculty/Chair:
Title of the Journal:
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN:
1664-1078
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2025
Volume:
16
Issue:
1592614
Pages:
Language:
English
Abstract:
Introduction: The World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a widely used self-report measure for evaluating mental well-being in both general and clinical populations. This study examines the psychometric properties of the WHO-5 using a large, representative sample of the adult population in Germany (N = 2,515) and presents updated population norms.
Methods: Analyses included item-level statistics such as means, standard deviations, and inter-item correlations. Construct validity was evaluated through correlations with measures of depression (PHQ-2), anxiety (GAD-2), somatic symptoms (SSS-8), and loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale). Internal consistency was measured using coefficient omega, while factorial validity was tested through confirmatory factor analysis based on a one-factor model. Measurement invariance was assessed across gender and age groups using multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. Population norms are reported for the total sample and various age groups.
Results: The findings confirm the strong psychometric properties of the WHO-5, including its internal consistency and construct validity. Measurement invariance results support comparability of scores across gender and age. The updated norms offer.
Discussion: These updated norms support the continued implementation of the WHO-5 as a practical tool for population-based prevention and mental health care planning.
Methods: Analyses included item-level statistics such as means, standard deviations, and inter-item correlations. Construct validity was evaluated through correlations with measures of depression (PHQ-2), anxiety (GAD-2), somatic symptoms (SSS-8), and loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale). Internal consistency was measured using coefficient omega, while factorial validity was tested through confirmatory factor analysis based on a one-factor model. Measurement invariance was assessed across gender and age groups using multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. Population norms are reported for the total sample and various age groups.
Results: The findings confirm the strong psychometric properties of the WHO-5, including its internal consistency and construct validity. Measurement invariance results support comparability of scores across gender and age. The updated norms offer.
Discussion: These updated norms support the continued implementation of the WHO-5 as a practical tool for population-based prevention and mental health care planning.
GND Keywords: ; ;
Wohlbefinden
Fragebogen
Psychometrie
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
well-being
self-report questionnaire
population norms
psychometrics
measurement invariance
DDC Classification:
RVK Classification:
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Open Access Journal:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
August 26, 2025
Versioning
Question on publication
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/109851