Options
New norm values of the brief resilience scale (BRS) from the German general population with new post-COVID-19 data
Rösner, Christoph; Brähler, Elmar; Sachser, Cedric; u. a. (2024): New norm values of the brief resilience scale (BRS) from the German general population with new post-COVID-19 data, in: BMC Psychology, London: BioMed Central, Jg. 12, Nr. 1, 499, S. 1–11, doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01995-0.
Author:
Title of the Journal:
BMC Psychology
ISSN:
2050-7283
Publisher Information:
Year of publication:
2024
Volume:
12
Issue:
1, 499
Pages:
Language:
English
Abstract:
Background:
The concept of psychological resilience has spurred extensive research across various fields, with the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) emerging as a concise tool to measure an individual’s ability to rebound from stress. It has been translated into multiple languages, including German, but the validation of the German version occurred prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine new norm values and psychometric properties of the BRS.
Methods:
Norm values, the factor structure, reliability and validity of the BRS were examined using data from a representative survey of the German general population (N = 2522).
Results:
The results indicated that the method-factor model showed the best fit, suggesting a nuanced understanding of resilience beyond a single-factor approach. The BRS demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity based on both latent and manifest correlations. Moreover, the study revealed increasing postpandemic resilience scores.
Conclusions:
The results of this study provide support for the psychometric reliability and validity of the German version of the BRS after the COVID-19 pandemic and underscore the importance of assessing resilience amidst evolving societal challenges and highlight the need for further exploration in diverse populations.
The concept of psychological resilience has spurred extensive research across various fields, with the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) emerging as a concise tool to measure an individual’s ability to rebound from stress. It has been translated into multiple languages, including German, but the validation of the German version occurred prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine new norm values and psychometric properties of the BRS.
Methods:
Norm values, the factor structure, reliability and validity of the BRS were examined using data from a representative survey of the German general population (N = 2522).
Results:
The results indicated that the method-factor model showed the best fit, suggesting a nuanced understanding of resilience beyond a single-factor approach. The BRS demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity based on both latent and manifest correlations. Moreover, the study revealed increasing postpandemic resilience scores.
Conclusions:
The results of this study provide support for the psychometric reliability and validity of the German version of the BRS after the COVID-19 pandemic and underscore the importance of assessing resilience amidst evolving societal challenges and highlight the need for further exploration in diverse populations.
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
BRS
German version
Representative sample
Norm data
Covid-19 pandemic
Peer Reviewed:
Yes:
International Distribution:
Yes:
Open Access Journal:
Yes:
Type:
Article
Activation date:
April 8, 2026
Versioning
Question on publication
Permalink
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/114607